By Ajit Krishna Dasa
The Common Objection: No Shared Foundations
Some argue that meaningful debate between the theist and the atheist is impossible. Their reasoning is simple: if one accepts that reality is founded on the Supreme Person, and the other denies any transcendent source, what real dialogue is possible? Aren’t they just speaking past one another, trapped within incompatible presuppositions?
This objection seems persuasive at first glance. After all, if our basic assumptions about reality, truth, and meaning differ, what common ground could we possibly share?
Continue reading “Can Theists and Atheists Debate Meaningfully? A Vaisnava Perspective”